Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用
1标价29.06亿！“招商伊敦号”邮轮确定要被卖了。。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
Tag, share and comment on the clips
，更多细节参见WPS官方版本下载
Что думаешь? Оцени!
英國超市將巧克力鎖進防盜盒阻止「訂單式」偷竊，更多细节参见im钱包官方下载